Report of the Safe Drinking Water Committee National Academy of Sciences
Please Read
Disclaimer
Pages 440 through 447 of the Report of the Safe Drinking
Water Committee of the National Academy of Sciences, 1977, "Drinking
Water and Health," by the National Academy of Sciences, 1977.
International Standard Book No. 0-309-02619-9. It is available from:
Printing and Publishing Office
National Academy of Sciences
2101 Constitution Ave.
Washington. DC 20419
The EPA funded the study, which states that the rates
of cardiovascular death among populations drinking very soft water
may be "as much as 15-20% higher than among populations using
hard water", as indicated by "more than 50 studies in nine
countries".
"In the United States, cardiovascular
diseases account for more than one-half of the approximate 2 million
deaths occurring each year... It
is estimated that optimal conditioning of drinking water could reduce
this cardiovascular disease mortality rate by as much as 15% in the
United States "
440 DRINKING WATER AND HEALTH
. . . and the problem has been the subject of several
comprehensive reviews. The Subcommittee on Morbidity and Mortality,
in preparing this report, has relied heavily on several of these reviews,
notably those by Craun and McCabe (1975), Heyden (1976), Neri et
al. (1974), Sauer (1974), Sharrett and Feinleib (1975), Schroeder
and Kraemer (1974), and Winton and McCabe (1970). These reviews have
been abstracted and summarized rather than reprinting the same material
or attempting another review.
It should be noted, also, that the World Health Organization
and the International Atomic Energy Agency consider that there is sufficient
evidence for the involvement of trace elements in the pathogenesis
of cardiovascular diseases to warrant international collaborative studies
on the problem (IAEA, 1973; WHO, 1973). The possible causal association
between water hardness and cardiovascular disease has been recognized
in Great Britain to be of enough potential public health importance
to have resulted in official governmental expert review of the problem
(MRC, 1970; COMA, 1974).
More than 50 studies in nine countries have been carried
out on possible relationship of water hardness and health. Most of
the investigations were in the United Kingdom, United States, and Canada;
they reveal a consistent trend of significant statistical associations
between the hardness characteristics of drinking water and the incidence
of cardiovascular problems (heart disease, hypertension, and stroke)
and, to a lesser extent, other diseases. Generally, reports have shown
an inverse correlation between the incidence of cardiovascular disease
and the amount of hardness of drinking water, or, conversely, a positive
correlation with the degree of softness. Studies in the United States
and Canada have shown that age-adjusted cardiovascular mortality rates
among populations using very soft water may be as much as 15-20% higher
than among populations using hard water. The differential reported
for the United Kingdom may be as high as 40%.
Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death
in the United States, where they account for more than 50% of all causes
of death, or roughly 1 million deaths each year, and death rates from
coronary heart disease have been steadily increasing over the past
few decades.
It is evident, therefore, that if water factors are
ultimately proven to be involved causally in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular
disease, then we are confronted with a major public health problem
and current water treatment practices will have to be greatly modified.
The credibility of these water-factor studies depend
more on the consistent trend of the findings than their biological
plausibility or the size of the correlation coefficients or the actual
significance levels.
Inorganic
Solutes 441
However, there is some scientific justification for
the biological plausibility of these associations. There has been increasing
evidence that certain trace elements play an important role in a number
of biological processes through their action as activators or inhibitors
of enzymatic reactions, by competing with other elements and proteins
for binding sites, by influencing the permeability of cell membranes,
or through other mechanisms. It is assumed that these elements can
also directly or indirectly exert an action on cardiac cells, the blood
vessel walls, on blood pressure, or other systems related to cardiovascular
function, such as lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. It is assumed
further that water quality can affect man's trace element or mineral
balance and, consequently, cardiovascular function.
As previously noted, the preponderance of reported evidence
indicates statistically significant correlations between some drinking
water factor(s) and the incidence of cardiovascular diseases resulting
in a general impression that inorganic substances in water may be causally
implicated. It must be emphasized, however, that there is considerable
disagreement among various investigators concerning the magnitude or
even the existence of a "water factor" risk, the identity
of the water factor(s), the mode of action, and the specific pathologic
effects.
Theories on Risk Factors
Several hypotheses have been offered on how components
of drinking water may affect cardiovascular function and disease; these
generally fall into one of the following classes:
1. That one or more of the principal "bulk" constituents
of hardness in tap water are protective.
2. That one or more of the trace elements that tend
to be present in hard water are protective.
3. That harmful metals are present in soft water, possibly
having been picked up by leaching from the distribution system.
4. That other factors are involved. Each class of hypotheses
is briefly reviewed below.
PROTECTIVE EFFECT FROM BULK CONSTITUENTS OF HARD WATER
Hardness is not a specific constituent of water, but
is a complex and variable mixture of cations and anions. Several investigators
have attributed the disease-protective effect of hard water to the
presence of
442 DRINKING WATER AND HEALTH
calcium and magnesium, which are the principal cations
found in hard water. Calcium, magnesium, and hardness generally correlate
well with one another. In a few studies, however, it was possible to
discriminate between the two elements and treat them as separate variables.
When calcium and magnesium are separately correlated with cardiovascular
disease rates, calcium appears to correlate with greater significance
in the United Kingdom, whereas in the United States the correlations
are about equally strong for calcium and magnesium.
There is a limited amount of evidence to explain the
possible mechanism whereby calcium and/or magnesium may play a role
in protection against cardiovascular diseases. Experimentally, a moderate
increase of calcium in the diet results in lower levels of circulating
and organ cholesterol; this is speculated as a possible factor in the
association noted between water hardness and cardiovascular diseases.
Magnesium is theorized to protect against lipid deposits in arteries
and also may have some anticoagulant properties that could protect
against cardiovascular diseases by inhibiting blood clot formation.
Also, there is evidence to indicate that there may be higher concentrations
of calcium and magnesium in certain tissues among residents of hard
water areas as compared to soft water areas.
PROTECTIVE ACTION OF TRACE ELEMENTS IN HARD WATER
There is a paucity of systematic data concerning the
concentrations of trace elements as a correlate of hardness of water
and cardiovascular disease rates. From a limited number of studies
that have been carried out, if hard water contains protective beneficial
elements (other than calcium and magnesium), vanadium, lithium, and
possibly manganese and chromium emerge as candidates.
Lithium and vanadium have been reported to be negatively
correlated with cardiovascular mortality. These negative correlations
appear to persist and remain significant even after controlling for
calcium and magnesium. The biological functions of these metals are
obscure. It is speculated that lithium may have a specific influence
on catecholamines and coronary-prone behavioral patterns. Vanadium
is reported as an essential trace element in human nutrition and thought
to inhibit hepatic cholesterol synthesis and reduce serum cholesterol.
Increased intake of vanadium is believed therefore to reduce serum
cholesterol. 'The mechanism is thought to be an inhibition of cholesterol
synthesis, especially in young subjects.
A case is made that chromium, which is positively correlated
with the
Inorganic
Solutes 443
hardness of tap water in North America (but not in the
United Kingdom), may be causally involved. Experimentally, chromium
deficiency produces elevated serum glucose and cholesterol levels and
increased deposition of aortic plaques. Though quantitative estimates
of daily chromium requirements cannot be given yet, it is thought that
the chromium level in hard water may help protect against a deficiency.
Similarly, it is speculated that hard water may protect against a deficiency
of manganese which also experimentally is associated with decreased
glucose tolerance.
HARMFUL ELEMENTS IN SOFT WATER
Soft water tends to be more corrosive than hard water.
As a result certain trace metals are found in higher concentrations
in soft than in hard water. Several such metals have been suggested
as possible intermediaries in the increased cardiovascular disease
rates associated with soft water. Based on very limited data, cadmium,
lead, copper, and zinc have been suspected to be possibly involved
in the induction of cardiovascular disease. These metals often occur
in plumbing materials and have been found to leach into soft drinking
water.
There is evidence that relatively low doses of cadmium
can produce hypertension in rats. It is known that the metal can accumulate
in human kidneys and produce renal damage and presumably could affect
blood pressure. However, direct evidence linking cadmium in water to
heart disease in humans is lacking.
Several studies have shown elevated levels of blood
lead occurring among persons living in homes having lead plumbing and
soft water, or both. But the relationship between these elevated blood
lead levels and cardiovascular disease remains unclear.
There are limited data suggesting that the intake levels
of copper and zinc from soft water may adversely affect cardiovascular
disease rates. However, there are conflicting data from other studies.
Still other studies suggest that the discrepancies may be due to the
failure to examine critically the ionic form and the intake ratios
of the suspect metals from all sources, particularly the Zn:Cu and
the Cd:Zn ratios as well as various other metabolic variables.
OTHER FACTORS AND CONFOUNDING VARIABLES
From the above discussion, it is apparent that there
is no shortage of hypotheses to explain how components of drinking
water might affect
444 DRINKING WATER AND HEALTH
cardiovascular function and disease. It is necessary
to consider these hypotheses along with other factors and some confounding
variables.
Several cations found predominantly in hard water are
theorized to exert a beneficial effect on cardiovascular function,
and other cations found in soft water, to exert a detrimental effect.
The question often raised is whether drinking water can provide enough
of these elements to have any significant impact on the pathogenesis
of cardiovascular diseases when considered in the context of the total
intake of these elements through other dietary and environmental pathways.
Hard or mineralized water generally would supply less than 10-15% of
the total dietary intake for calcium and magnesium.
Water provides even a smaller proportion of the total
intake for the various suspect trace metals with the possible exception
of lead. The largest proportion of trace metal intake from water compared
to food is for zinc, but even for this water provides only about 4%
of its total dietary intake. For all other suspect metals drinking
water provides under 4% of total intake. The concentrations of lead
in certain drinking waters may exceed 100 µg/liter as compared
to an average adult daily dietary intake of about 300 µg.
Several investigators, however, point out that the amount
of these elements provided through drinking water relative to other
sources is less important than their chemical form. It is theorized
that trace elements often occur in a chelated form in foods and may
be less available metabolically than the ionized form that generally
occurs in water. Also, the valence form of elements found in water
may differ from that in foods and affect metabolic behavior.
Another possible variable is the different effect of
hard and soft waters on the mineral composition of foods during cooking.
It is theorized that soft water may remove a significantly higher proportion
of various "protective" nutrients and elements from foods
during cooking than do hard waters.
Most of the studies carried out to date correlate mortality
rates with measurements made on raw rather than on finished water;
the correlations were of lesser statistical significance when finished
water was used.
There was considerable variation in the study design
and methods among the numerous investigations reported. As previously
noted, most of the studies report a statistically significant correlation
between water hardness and one or more of several cardiovascular diseases.
It is not possible, however, to quantitatively compare the data from
many of these studies because of the different criteria and indices
used in the specification of cause of death. The case for a causal
association of water factors to any specific pathologic effects is
thought to be further
Inorganic
Solutes 445
weakened by several reports of correlations of the water
factor with other causes of death, such as bronchitis, infant mortality,
malignancies, cirrhosis, and other noncardiovascular causes of death.
Despite the consistent trend for most of the reported studies, a few
studies have shown negative or conflicting results for different age
and sex groups. For example, in Holland and Sweden, hard water was
correlated with decreased cardiovascular mortality among women but
not men, and an opposite finding emerged from a study in Newfoundland.
The strength and specificity of the correlative studies
have varied depending on the sample sizes of the area and population.
In general, the relationship appears stronger in larger and more populous
areas.
To some extent these differences are probably due to
a lack of sensitivity of correlation coefficients related statistically
to the size of the sampling unit. Obviously, smaller geographical units
with smaller populations would tend to have less stable death rates
and consistency than larger ones, so that any variable will tend to
correlate less well with smaller geographical and population bases.
But it should be noted that the size of the metropolitan area and population
density tend to correlate well with cardiovascular disease rates independently
of water quality. This is attributed to various cultural and socioeconomic
factors that appear to influence cardiovascular disease mortality rates.
On the other hand, less urban areas are more likely to-use relatively
hard groundwater and, conversely, larger metropolitan areas are usually
more dependent on softer surface waters. In a few studies where corrections
for socioeconomic factors were attempted, the correlations with hardness
of water still exist but with a reduced statistical significance. It
is possibility that both urbanization and water mineralization have
an effect on cardiovascular disease rates and could be interacting
or acting separately.
Several studies have shown statistically significant
correlations of death rates with various geographical and climatic
variables, especially rainfall, independently of water-quality variables.
Much more work must be done on the possible associations and interrelationships
of variables such as rain, soil chemistry, and human nutrition with
water-quality and cardiovascular disease rates.
From this review, it is clear that there is no shortage
of hypotheses related to how the components of drinking water might
affect cardiovascular function and disease. Despite the large body
of evidence supporting the hypotheses, there are too many confounding
variables and discrepancies in the data to permit any scientifically
sound conclusions as to the specific role of water factors in the pathogenesis
of cardiovascular diseases.
446 DRINKING WATER AND HEALTH
Summary-Water Hardness and Health
There is a large body of scientific information that
indicates certain inorganic or mineral constituents of drinking water
are correlated with increased morbidity and mortality rates. These
constituents by usual definition are not considered to be "contaminants," as
they often are associated with the level of "hardness" of
drinking water and occur naturally or are picked up from water-treatment
or distribution systems. Hardness is due primarily to the presence
of ions of calcium and magnesium and is expressed as the equivalent
quantity of calcium carbonate (CaCO3). Water with less than 75 mg CaCO3/liter
is generally considered soft, and above 75 mg/liter as hard.
A voluminous body of literature suggests that in the
United States and other developed nations, the incidence of many chronic
diseases, but particularly cardiovascular diseases (heart disease,
hypertension, and stroke), is associated with various water characteristics
related to hardness. Most of these reports indicate an inverse correlation
between the incidence of cardiovascular disease and the amount of hardness.
A few reports also indicate a similar inverse correlation between the
hardness of-water and the causes of risk from several noncardiovascular
causes of death as well.
Several hypotheses are reported on how water factor(s)
may effect health; these mostly involve either a protective action
attributed to some elements found in hard water or harmful effects
attributed to certain metals often found in soft water.
The theorized protective agents include calcium, magnesium,
vanadium, lithium, chromium, and manganese. The suspect harmful agents
include the metals cadmium, lead, copper, and zinc, all of which tend
to be found in higher concentrations in soft water as a result of the
relative corrosiveness of soft water.
It is evident from the review of the literature that
there is considerable disagreement concerning the magnitude or even
the existence of a "water factor" risk, the identity of the
specific causal factor(s), the mode of action, and the specific pathologic
effects.
Nevertheless, the preponderance of reported evidence
reflects a consistent trend of statistically significant inverse correlations
between the hardness of water and the incidence of cardiovascular diseases.
As a result, there is a general impression that harmful elements in
soft water and/or protective elements in hard water are causally implicated
in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular and possibly other chronic diseases.
The wide spectrum of alleged associated effects, the
lack of consistency in theorized or reported etiologic factors, the
very small quantities of
Inorganic
Solutes 447
suspect elements in water relative to other sources,
and the discrepancies between studies raise serious questions as to
whether drinking water really serves as a vehicle of causal agents,
is an indicator of something broader within the environment, or represents
some unexplained spurious associations. Despite these uncertainties,
the body of evidence is sufficiently compelling to treat the "water
story" as plausible, particularly when the number of potentially
preventable deaths from cardiovascular diseases is considered. In the
United States, cardiovascular diseases account for more than one-half
of the approximate 2 million deaths occurring each year. On the assumption
that water factor(s) are causally implicated, it is estimated that
optimal conditioning of drinking water could reduce this annual cardiovascular
disease mortality rate by as much as 15% in the United States.
In view of this potential health significance, it is
essential to ascertain whether water factors are causally linked to
the induction of cardiovascular or other diseases and, if so, to identify
the specific factors that are involved. Much more definitive information
is needed in order to identify what remedial water treatment actions,
if any, can be considered.
REFERENCES FOR TRACE METALS
Aberg, B., L. Ekman, R. Falk, U. Greitz, G. Persson,
and J.0. Snihs. 1969. Metabolism of methyl mercury (203 Hg) compounds
in man. Arch. Environ. Health 19:478-494.
Ackermann, W.C. 1971. Minor Elements in Illinois Surface
Waters. Illinois State Water Survey Technical Letter 14.
Adamson, A.H., DA. Valks, M.A. Appleton, and W.B. Shaw.
1969. Copper toxicity in housed lambs. Vet. Rec. 85:368-369.
Aikawa, J.K., E.L. Rhoades, and G.S. Gordon. 1952. Urinary
and fecal excretion of orally administered Me. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol.
Mod. 98:39-3 1.
Albert, R.E., R.E. Shore, A.J. Sayers, C. Strehlow,
T.J. Kneip, B.S. Pasternack, AJ. Friedhoff, F. Covan, and J.A. Cimino.
1974. Follow-up of children overexposed to lead. Environ. Health Perspect.,
Exp. Issue no. 7, pp. 33-39.
Alberts, J.J., J.E. Schindler, and R.W. Miller. 1974.
Mercury determinations in natural waters by persulfate oxidation. Anal.
Chem. 46:434-437.
Aldous, K.M., D.G. Mitchell, and K.W. Jackson. 1975.
Simultaneous determination of seven trace metals in potable water using
a Vidicon atomic absorption spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 47:1034-1037.
Alexander, F.W., H.T. Delves, and B. E. Clayton. 1973.
The uptake and excretion by children of lead and other contaminants.
In Environmental Health Aspects of Lead, Proc. Int. Symp., Amsterdam,
Oct. 2-6,1972. Luxembourg, Commission of the European Communities,
pp. 319-331.
American Public Health Association. 1976. Standard Methods
for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 13th ed. Washington, D.C.,
American Society for Testing and Materials. 1970. Annual
Book of ASTM Standards, pt. 23, Water and atmospheric analysis. Philadelphia . |